Stocks against their minerals over a year
The linked pairs, the median divergence and how many stocks beat their mineral.
How the listed companies linked to a mineral performed against that mineral’s benchmark price, and whether owning the producer paid off better or worse than the material it produces.
Divergence is the stock’s return minus the mineral’s benchmark return over the same period (1M, 6M, 1Y or 5Y), in percentage points. Above zero, the stock beat the mineral; below zero, it lagged. Plotted against the stock’s own return, every stock falls into one of four quadrants:
Share-price returns are calculated for each listing whenever share prices are updated, and benchmark returns from the monthly benchmark prices.
The two returns cover periods with the same label but not always the same end date: a stock’s return runs to its latest share price, while a benchmark’s runs to its latest monthly price. Stockatomics benchmarks use the latest available underlying trade data. Reporting schedules vary by market and may result in a publication lag of up to several weeks, so keep that in mind when reading short periods such as 1M.
The linked pairs, the median divergence and how many stocks beat their mineral.
Each linked stock against its mineral’s benchmark, in four quadrants.
The stock’s return minus the mineral’s benchmark return over the same period (1M, 6M, 1Y or 5Y), in percentage points. Above zero, the stock beat the mineral; below zero, it lagged.
Positive, outperforming: the stock rose, and by more than the mineral. Positive, lagging: it rose, but by less. Negative, outperforming: it fell, but by less than the mineral. Negative, lagging: it fell, and by more than the mineral.
The full method is set out in our research paper.