Least and most elastic minerals
Every mineral’s SES, from the hardest supply to expand to the easiest.
How hard it is for supply to respond when demand rises. SES runs from 0 to 100: the higher the score, the less new supply a price rise can bring on, and the longer a shortage can last.
A price rise only eases a shortage if it brings on more supply. For some minerals that happens within a year or two; for others, new mines take a decade, refining capacity sits in one place, nothing can substitute for the mineral in its end uses and little comes back from recycling. SES scores those obstacles the same way for every mineral, so you can compare how long a supply squeeze could last.
It is a structural score: it changes when the supply side changes, through new capacity, a substitute or a recycling route, rather than with the price.
SES also feeds the company scores: it is part of CMCS, Mineral exposure (MES) and Supply leverage (SLS), so a company’s output in a mineral whose supply is hard to expand counts for more than the same output in one whose supply responds easily.
Every mineral’s SES, from the hardest supply to expand to the easiest.
How many minerals sit in each of the five SES bands.
Each mineral’s time to add supply, capital, processing, substitution and recycling scores.
How hard it is for a critical mineral’s supply to respond when demand rises. SES runs from 0 to 100: the higher the score, the less new supply a price rise can bring on, and the longer a shortage can last.
SES is the average of five factors, each scored 0–100: time to add supply, capital intensity, processing difficulty, substitution difficulty and recycling difficulty.
No. It is a structural score: it changes when the supply side changes, through new capacity, a substitute or a recycling route, rather than with the price.
The full method is set out in our research paper.